Slaughter and killing
Understanding
how animals are killed for food is clearly not a pleasant subject.
However, all
consumers have a right to be aware of how animals farmed for food production
are killed, and to understand the extent of the killing involved, in order to
make an informed choice as to whether or not they wish to be a part of it.
But animals are only killed for meat, surely? You don’t need to kill animals to take milk or
eggs from them?
All foods
taken from animals, not just meat, involve killing in order to produce them.
While it is
obvious that animals are killed to produce meat, what is perhaps less obvious
to the consumer is that large-scale killing is also an unavoidable part of
farming animals for milk and eggs.
For every
egg-laying hen hatched, a male chick is killed at less than a day old, as they
cannot be used to produce eggs or meat. Over
30 million male chicks a year are killed in the UK.1
Dairy cows are
made to give birth every year to keep them producing enough milk. The calves
are taken from their mothers at a very young age, usually soon after
birth. The surplus calves who are not
kept as dairy cows will either be shot at birth or killed later on as part of
the meat industry.2
Dairy cows
and egg-laying hens themselves are killed when they cease to produce enough
milk or eggs to remain profitable, at a young age relative to their natural
lifespans.3,4
This is true
even of ‘high-welfare’ farming systems.
Male calves and chicks cannot produce milk or eggs, and cows and hens do
not produce “sufficient” quantities of milk and eggs indefinitely, whichever
system they are farmed in.
What is slaughter?
“Slaughter”
is defined by The Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations (1995)
as “causing the death of the animal by bleeding”.5
Animals
farmed for food production in the UK are commonly put to death by bleeding including
cattle, pigs, poultry and sheep. This is
referred to as “sticking”.5
Animals are
hoisted onto a conveyer belt hung up by a back leg and one or both carotid
arteries (which provide the main supply of blood to the brain) are slit.5
Both arteries are slit in the case of slaughter without pre-stunning.6 They are then left to bleed until death occurs.
Stunning
Stunning must
be attempted before slaughter, with the exception of some religious slaughter
methods which are exempt from the requirement to stun.5
In theory,
stunning should render the animal unconscious until he or she dies. There are concerns that stunning is not
always successful, particularly in smaller birds and birds who struggle and
therefore miss the electrocution bath, if the voltage used for stunning is
insufficient, if stunning is administered incorrectly, or if too much time
elapses between stunning and slaughter and the animal regains consciousness. 1,7
Animals are
permitted to be stunned by the following methods:5
·
Captive bolt
Most
commonly used on cattle. Sheep, calves,
pigs and goats may also be stunned using this method.7
A
bolt is shot into the brain to render the animal unconscious. The shot does not kill the animal.7
·
Electrical stunning with tongs
Most
commonly used on pigs, sheep and calves.
Tongs
are placed on either side of the head to stun the animal.
Stunning
is ineffective if the tongs are placed incorrectly, for example if the animal
resists or the stun is attempted too quickly or carelessly.7
Group-stunning
of pigs, sheep, calves and goats is common.
A group of animals will be brought in to the stun pen and each one
stunned in turn in front of the others.7
·
Electrically charged water bath
Used
on poultry.
Poultry
are stunned by suspending the animals upside down by their legs in shackles and
submerging their heads in an electrically charged water bath.
It
is recommended that the shackles should be sprayed with water to increase the
effectiveness of the electrical stun.8
Inverting
poultry before stunning causes them distress as it is unnatural for them to be
upside down. It also causes fractures, particularly in egg-laying hens whose
bones are weakened from being used for egg production.1
What is killing?
“Killing” is
defined by WASK (1995) as, “causing the
death of the animal by any process other than slaughter”.5
Permitted
killing methods (depending on the species of animal) include:5
·
Gas chamber stunning and killing
Used
on pigs and poultry. Day-old male chicks
are also killed by gassing.
Referred
to as “exposure to gas mixtures”5 or “controlled atmosphere stun
killing”.8
Gas
stunning does not immediately cause the animal to lose consciousness and
animals can show signs of distress in the period between exposure to gas and
becoming unconscious.7
·
“Instantaneous Mechanical Destruction”
Day-old
male chicks are minced alive using “mechanical apparatus producing immediate
death” 5 which must contain “rapidly rotating
mechanically operated killing blades or projections”.5
·
Shooting
Most
commonly used to kill unwanted dairy calves and surplus lambs.
The
Humane Slaughter Association recommends that “an appropriate firearm is the
most effective and humane means of killing calves”, preferably a shotgun, aimed
at the middle of the forehead.9
An
estimated 180,000 male calves were shot at birth between June 2008 and May
2009.2
·
Poultry
are also permitted to be killed by neck
dislocation or decapitation.8
Killing of fish
Methods used to kill farmed fish are
different from those used on land animals.
Farmed fish are stunned and/or killed by various methods depending on
the species involved, including:10,11,12
-
electrical stunning,
-
live chilling,
-
asphyxia,
-
blows to the head,
-
shooting,
-
exposure to carbon dioxide.
In
particular, killing by asphyxia, asphyxia on ice and carbon dioxide are
considered to result in poor welfare during death. Carbon dioxide produces a strong adverse
reaction and does not reliably result in unconsciousness, meaning that fish can
be gutted or bled while still conscious.13
There are no
specific regulations on if or how farmed fish should be stunned and killed.
UK slaughter
and killing regulations only extend to farmed fish in a general sense that, “No
person engaged in the movement, lairaging, restraint, stunning, slaughter or
killing of animals shall— (a)cause any avoidable excitement, pain or suffering
to any animal; or (b)permit any animal to sustain any avoidable excitement,
pain or suffering.”5
There are no
regulations covering the killing of sea-caught fish. Fish caught at sea simply die from suffocation once they are
taken from the sea.
Transport to the slaughterhouse
The slaughter
or killing process begins with catching the animals and transporting them to
the slaughterhouse.
Transport and
handling in itself can be stressful to some animals, due to being in unfamiliar
surroundings.14
Catching is a
particular problem for end-of-lay hens as their weakened bones mean that they are
very susceptible to fractures, which often occur as they are carried by their
legs, up to three birds per hand.1
Problems
during transport
Animals being
transported can suffer from various problems, including:15
- heat stress
due to inadequate ventilation (pigs);
- exhaustion and injury due to insufficient floor space (sheep),
- slippery floors and lack of partitions in the transporter and fear caused by
being handled through inadequate loading facilities (cattle),
- exposure to heat or cold stress due to inadequately controlled ventilation
(meat chickens, end-of-lay hens and newly-hatched chicks)
- presence of existing injuries and disease (end-of-lay hens)
- hypothermia (newly-hatched chicks)
Journey
times
Under EU
regulations, farmed animals are permitted to be transported for: up to 28 hours
with a one hour break (cattle, sheep and goats); 24 hours (pigs) or 18 hours
with a one hour break (unweaned lambs, kids, calves, foals and piglets).15 There is no maximum journey time for poultry.1
Does killing have a place in ‘compassionate’
consumerism?
Sales of
‘higher-welfare’ animal ‘products’ are rising each year,16 demonstrating consumers’
ever-increasing desire for farmed animals to be treated compassionately.
The next
question to ask is surely: is killing a sentient animal consistent with wanting
that animal to be treated compassionately?
Is killing acceptable?
Ask someone
if they believe that killing is acceptable, and they will probably answer no,
or perhaps only under a few specific circumstances (e.g. to alleviate
suffering, or in self-defence or defence of another when life is at risk).
Ask if, more
specifically, they believe that killing for pleasure is acceptable, and few
people would answer yes.
Despite this,
many consumers continue to choose to cause the death of other sentient
creatures for reasons of personal pleasure on a daily basis, each time they buy
or eat animal “products”.
However; this
choice is not usually the result of a conscious, rational decision in favour of
killing.
Most people
are brought up to believe that eating or using things taken from animals is a
normal, even positive choice. This
conditioning is often well established before they are old enough to understand
the concept of killing and death.
Many people
then continue to their actions largely due to habit or convenience, rather than
ever having made a conscious decision to do so.
We can also
find it difficult to choose behaviour which is outside the expected norms in
our families or social groups, or which differ from the values and traditions
we were brought up with. The expectation
or desire to conform can be enough to deter us from considering changing our
actions - even when we know that, in truth, the change will be a positive
choice.
In countries
where a variety of foods, clothing and other products are available and there
is therefore no need to consume or use animals, it is hard to argue that choosing
to cause death in this way is a necessity, rather than a choice or simply a
convenient habit.
Choosing to buy vegan, 100%
plant-based food and products is an easy way for consumers to be sure that the things
they buy have not caused the death or suffering of a farmed animal.
1. Farm Animal Welfare
Council (FAWC). Report on the welfare of farmed animals at slaughter or
killing. Part 2: White meat animals.
London: FAWC; 2009 http://www.fawc.org.uk/pdf/report-090528.pdf
(accessed 8 March 2011)
2. Beyond Calf Exports
Stakeholders Forum. Attitudes to male
dairy calves are becoming more black and white. Beyond Calf Exports
Stakeholders Forum; 2009 http://www.ciwf.org.uk/includes/documents/cm_docs/2009/c/calf_forum_report.pdf
(accessed 8 March 2011)
3. DairyCo. Strategies
to reduce culling rates. Cirencester: DairyCo; 2008 http://www.dairyco.org.uk/library/farming-info-centre/health--welfare/strategies-to-reduce-culling-rates-.aspx
(accessed 8 March 2011)
4. Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). The structure of the United
Kingdom poultry industry: commercial poultry sector. Defra; 2006
http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/vetsurveillance/documents/commercial-poultry-ind.pdf
(accessed 8 March 2011)
5. The Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or
Killing) Regulations (1995). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/731/contents/made
(accessed 8 March 2011)
6. Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009
of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF
(accessed 8 March 2011)
7. FAWC. Report on the welfare of
farmed animals at slaughter or killing. Part 1: Red meat animals. London: FAWC; 2003.
8. Defra. The welfare
of poultry at slaughter or killing. London: Defra; 2007 http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/welfare/documents/poultrywelfare.pdf
(accessed 8 March 2011)
9. Humane Slaughter
Association (HSA). Humane Dispatch and Disposal of Infant Calves. Wheathampstead:
HSA; 2007 http://www.hsa.org.uk/Resources/Publications/Technical%20Notes/calves.pdf
(accessed 8 March 2011)
10. European Food Safety Authority
(EFSA). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a
request from the European Commission on Species-specific welfare aspects of the
main systems of stunning and killing of farmed carp. The EFSA Journal 2009; 1013: 1-37 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1013.htm
(accessed 8 March 2011)
11. EFSA. Scientific
Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the
European Commission on welfare aspect of the main systems of stunning and
killing of farmed Atlantic salmon. The
EFSA Journal 2009; 1012: 1-3 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1011.htm
(accessed 8 March 2011)
12. EFSA. Scientific
Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the
European Commission on the species-specific welfare aspects of the main systems
of stunning and killing of farmed tuna. The EFSA Journal 2009; 1072:
1-53 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1072.htm (accessed 8 March
2011)
13. Scientific Opinion
of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the European
Commission on Species-specific welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning
and killing of farmed rainbow trout. The
EFSA Journal 2009; 1013: 1-55 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1012.htm
(accessed 8 March 2011)
14. Defra. Welfare of animals during transport.
London: Defra; 2010 http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/welfare/transport/documents/watoguidance100824.pdf
(accessed 2 March 11)
15. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and
Welfare (AHAW). Scientific Opinion
concerning the welfare of animals during transport. EFSA Journal 2011; 9(1):1966 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1966 (accessed 8 March 2011)
16. The Co-operative
Bank. Ethical Consumerism Report 2010. http://www.goodwithmoney.co.uk/assets/Uploads/Documents/EthicalConsumerismReport2010.pdf?token=799983266aaf60b631051927a4e3d5e1a367c92b|1299172079#PDFP
(accessed 8 March 2011)